Back
up for a moment. You may not have noticed, but the Egyptian economy
responded very well to market-opening reforms begun in the early 1990s
that attracted massive amounts of foreign capital. Real income per
capita has nearly tripled,
to a respectable $6,300. The catch: the growth dislocated the lives of
millions of Egyptians, eliminating the security of many government
workers, sucking the rural poor into crowded urban slums, and creating a
wealthy elite of insiders who made no effort to hide their (sometimes
ill-gotten) gains.
Often these reforms can turn a Roy economy into Biv too quickly, where g public property is still more efficient than Gb private property. it can also be an Iv-B economy that creates a boom then a bust with extreme winners and losers.
Often these reforms can turn a Roy economy into Biv too quickly, where g public property is still more efficient than Gb private property. it can also be an Iv-B economy that creates a boom then a bust with extreme winners and losers.
No
democratic government will succeed in the long run unless it reduces
official corruption, controls military patronage spending, lays out the
welcome mat for new businesses, and reforms the antiquated education
system.
A weak I-O police can be a symptom of the problem as much as a cause, if the countries has dissimilar groups then some might become enough of a majority to corrupt the justice system to favor them instead of being neutral.
But the immediate problem is managing the runaway food and energy subsidies that are now equivalent to about 10 percent of GDP.
A weak I-O police can be a symptom of the problem as much as a cause, if the countries has dissimilar groups then some might become enough of a majority to corrupt the justice system to favor them instead of being neutral.
But the immediate problem is managing the runaway food and energy subsidies that are now equivalent to about 10 percent of GDP.
Simply
targeting the funds to those truly in need would go a long way toward
fixing the problem. About one-third of the money pays for food, mostly
in the form of lower prices for bread sold to everybody, rich and poor.
The other two-thirds is in subsidies for gasoline, natural gas and
butane for cooking, little of which raises the living standards of the
poor; the rest goes to industry and the middle-class.
But
efficient targeting is more easily proposed than done. Subsidized bread
is widely viewed as a birth right. And it’s hard to imagine the Muslim
Brotherhood-led government risking an outbreak of urban discontent that
gave the military an excuse to reassert power. Gasoline and cooking gas
are almost as problematic -- Jordan just rescinded an increase in gasoline prices after mobs hit the streets (led, ironically, by the Muslim Brotherhood).
R-B people live chaotically on the edge, often subsidies are meant to normalize the costs so Bi-Ro people don't protest. This underlying chaos can lead to Ro protests as in the Arab Spring.
R-B people live chaotically on the edge, often subsidies are meant to normalize the costs so Bi-Ro people don't protest. This underlying chaos can lead to Ro protests as in the Arab Spring.
If
the subsidy system is to crack, the first fissures will probably be in
the delivery of cheap natural gas, most of which is used by business.
Indeed, the interim government floated a plan back in Julyfor
raising the price of natural gas sold to heavy industry. That’s a
credible beginning (if the government follows through), and one that
could pacify the IMF (and foreign investors) for a while. To save really
big bucks, though, gasoline would have to take a hit, and perhaps food
down the road.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.